The Kuyperian Dispensationalist |||

Questioning the Promises

scope and sequence

The epistle of Paul to the Romans is Scripture famous. Is there a more beloved letter in the New Testament? There certainly isn’t one that develops and celebrates the good news as much as Romans. The gospel is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes”! The reality that we all have sinned and deserve God’s wrath, followed by the revelation that God justifies those who believe in the sacrifice of His Son, is amazing doctrine. By the time the reader gets to the end of Romans 8 he is overwhelmed. We are more than conquerers through him who loved us.” Nothing will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

And as I brought up near the end of the previous post, wouldn’t it have been an obvious transition from the glories of God’s sovereign mercy and securing love in chapter 8 to the call to present ourselves as living sacrifices to God at the start of chapter 12?

This brings us to the first of five questions: Why are these three chapters here in the epistle?

Answer: the reason Paul wrote Romas 9-11 is to vindicate God’s faithfulness to His word to Israel.

The gospel promises are fantastic. They are worth living for and dying for. But a thoughtful reader of Romans would necessarily wonder 1) Why have so many Jews rejected Jesus? and 2) Has God changes His mind about the promises to the Jews? As it turns out, this is a huge issue. If God’s previous promises are revoked or redefined, then how can we trust that the gospel promises won’t be?

These chapters are dealing with the accusation against God that His word failed (Romans 9:6). Paul said it did not fail. But what is that word about? It’s about Paul’s kinsmen according to the flesh.”

They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen. (Romans 9:4–5)

Chapter 10 begins wth Paul’s desire for them,” his national kinsmen, to be saved. Chapter 11 begins with the question: Has God rejected His people?” And the answer is No, because Paul himself is a believing Israelite, not just that he is a believer.

The very presence of these chapters assumes that certain promises to Israel have not yet been fulfilled, otherwise there is no need to deal with the charge of failure” in Romans 9:6. Even more, the placement of these chapters argue that our confidence in the gospel is inextricably connected to God’s faithfulness to the Jews. So the argument continues about a future fulfillment of His word, not a redefined or spiritualized fulfillment, and that is good news indeed.

Have a comment, or want to offer (constructive) criticism? Reply on Twitter

Up next Mixing It Up By Any Other Name
Latest posts To the Point A Subordinate Telos Toward the Ultimate End The Blessed Option Provocative Fruit Jealousy Is the Objective Breaking the Rack Sharpening Our Exclamation Points Riches for the World Always Plan A By Any Other Name Questioning the Promises Mixing It Up Purchased But Not Yet Completed One-Sided Good News Terms Without Conditions Defining the Parties This Fixed Order Indispensabilities of Dispensationalists Unpleasantries about Dispensationalists Untruths about Dispensationalists Dividing for Peace A Dispensationalist and a Kuyperian Walk into Church It All Matters Out in Public The Ends of the Theology Department All Sanctimoniousness and Powerlessness Kuyperian: A High-Altitude Definition against Dualism Losing as a weapon Outside the Prayer Closet The First Chapter The Wide Wide World of Christ